Last updated: October 12, 2025 • Editor: Eric Gordon
Outsourcing your SDR function can transform pipeline—if you pick the right partner. The best outsourced SDR agency blends scale (data, automation, parallel dialing) with persuasion (voice, objection handling, relevant messaging). The wrong choice burns domains, books unqualified meetings, and wastes AE time. This guide gives you a clear selection framework, common pitfalls to avoid, and a balanced comparison of the top agencies—then explains where Outbound Sales Pro fits.
We reviewed publicly available service pages, pricing snapshots, and third-party review footprints. Each listing includes Best for, Core services, Pricing snapshot (if published), Review signals, and Watch-outs.
Why #1: OSP trains SDRs for persuasion (voice-inflection coaching, objection handling) while scaling throughput with parallel dialing and deliverability-first cold email via sister platform Parakeet. Programs emphasize accepted & held meetings, not vanity volume.
To compare in-house vs outsourced SDR economics, focus on cost-per-meeting (CPM) and downstream revenue. A simple model:
(Fully loaded monthly SDR cost) ÷ (Qualified meetings per month)
(Monthly retainer + per-meeting fees) ÷ (Qualified meetings per month)
(Close rate × ACV)
((Meetings × Revenue per meeting) − Total monthly cost) ÷ Total monthly cost
Example: If an in-house SDR costs $11,500/mo fully loaded and produces 12 qualified meetings, CPM ≈ $958. If an outsourced retainer is $5,000/mo for the same 12 meetings, CPM ≈ $416. Multiply by your revenue per meeting (win rate × ACV) to see which model returns more pipeline per dollar.
Run the full math with our step-by-step guide and calculator: Outsourced SDR Pricing (2025).
Agency | Primary Model | Public Starting Price* | Contract Flexibility | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Outbound Sales Pro (OSP) | Retainer (custom) | Custom, scope-based | Custom | AI-leveraged, human execution with parallel dialing + deliverability-first email; quality/held meetings. Multi-Channel: Email, LinkedIn, Cold Calling. |
Belkins | Retainer (tiers) | Ranges published | Custom | Appointment setting & LinkedIn; see pricing content on site. |
CIENCE | Data + SDR retainer | N/A | Custom | Scale/global coverage; automation-heavy motion. |
SalesHive | Packages | Public tiers | Month-to-month option | Transparent packages; confirm dialing approach. |
memoryBlue | Retainer | N/A | Custom | Global footprint via Operatix acquisition. |
Martal Group | Retainer | N/A | Custom | Enterprise focus; intent data. |
SalesRoads | Retainer | N/A | Custom | Strong PM rigor; US focus. |
LevelUp Leads | Retainer (tiers) | From ≈$5,000+/mo | Custom | Startup-friendly starting points. |
RevBoss | Platform-assisted | From ≈$1,500+/mo | Custom | Lighter-weight motion for founder-led teams. |
AltiSales | Consulting + SDR | N/A | Custom | GTM advisory + execution. |
*Public Starting Price reflects information vendors share on their sites and may change; always confirm current pricing, inclusions (dialers, data, deliverability), and meeting acceptance/held definitions.
Need help modeling cost-per-meeting and ROI across models? Use our pricing guide and calculator in Outsourced SDR Pricing (2025).
100% focus on meaningful results that convert to revenue. We combine parallel dialing (5–10× more live conversations/hour) with state-of-the-art, AI-powered SDR training to turn connects into meetings—then protect your domain with deliverability-first email via Parakeet. If you need a predictable, quality pipeline—not just activity—let’s talk.
While many agencies use "BDR" and "SDR" interchangeably, understanding the distinction helps you align expectations and select the right service model:
Aspect | BDR (Business Development Rep) | SDR (Sales Development Rep) |
---|---|---|
Primary Focus | Outbound prospecting to cold accounts | Inbound lead qualification & nurturing |
Lead Source | Proactive research, cold lists, intent data | Marketing-generated leads (MQLs, form fills, webinar attendees) |
Typical Activities | Cold calling, cold email, LinkedIn outreach to net-new accounts | Follow-up calls, nurture sequences, lead scoring validation |
Success Metrics | Connect rate, conversations from cold outreach, pipeline sourced | MQL-to-SQL conversion, response time, meeting acceptance rate |
Skillset Emphasis | Resilience, cold calling expertise, objection handling | Qualification frameworks (BANT/MEDDIC), consultative discovery |
Which should you outsource? If you lack pipeline and need net-new account penetration, prioritize BDR outsourcing with agencies skilled in cold outreach. If marketing generates leads but they stall, consider SDR outsourcing focused on rapid response and qualification. Many teams benefit from a hybrid approach—outsourced BDRs for top-of-funnel cold outreach paired with internal SDRs for inbound conversion.
For a deeper comparison of outsourced BDR services specifically, see our dedicated guide: Outsourced BDR Services (2025).
The build-versus-buy decision depends on your timeline (can you wait 3-6 months for hiring and ramp?), budget constraints ($125k-$150k fully loaded per in-house SDR vs $60k-$120k outsourced equivalent), product complexity, and whether you have experienced SDR management in place.
Quick framework: Outsource when you need pipeline fast (2-4 weeks), lack internal SDR expertise, or want to test new markets before committing headcount. Build in-house when product complexity requires 6+ months training, you need cultural fit and career development paths, or you have strong sales leadership to build repeatable processes.
For a complete cost-benefit analysis with ROI calculator and detailed decision framework, see: In-House vs Outsourced SDR Costs: Complete 2025 Comparison.
Avoid costly mistakes by scrutinizing these common contract pitfalls before committing to an outsourced SDR agency:
The Problem: Contract says "15 qualified meetings per month" but doesn't define qualification criteria or distinguish between booked vs held meetings.
What to Demand:
The Problem: Vendor retains ownership of contact data, sequences, talk tracks, and learnings after contract ends.
What to Demand:
The Problem: 12-month contract with no minimum meeting guarantees or performance exit clauses.
What to Demand:
The Problem: Monthly retainer excludes dialers, email tools, data licenses—costs balloon by $2k-$4k/month in "additional fees."
What to Demand:
The Problem: Contract doesn't address email deliverability protection—your domains get burned within 60 days.
What to Demand:
The Problem: Monthly reports show only high-level metrics (dials, emails sent) without transparency into quality, messaging, or call performance.
What to Demand:
Avoid vanity metrics. Track these eight KPIs to evaluate whether your outsourced SDR investment is driving real pipeline and revenue:
What it measures: Percentage of dials that reach a live human conversation (not voicemail).
Why it matters: Low connect rates (<5%) indicate poor list quality, wrong contact data, or timing issues. With parallel dialing, top agencies achieve 10-15% connect rates vs 5-8% with manual dialing.
How to improve: Use parallel dialers (3-5 simultaneous lines), optimize calling windows (10am-11am, 2pm-4pm local time), verify mobile vs landline data.
What it measures: Of live conversations, what percentage result in a booked meeting.
Why it matters: This reflects messaging quality, objection handling, and ICP fit. Rates below 15% suggest misaligned targeting or weak talk tracks.
How to improve: Tighten ICP criteria, A/B test value props, invest in objection handling training, review call recordings weekly.
What it measures: Percentage of scheduled meetings where the prospect actually shows up.
Why it matters: This is the #1 metric agencies hide. A 40% held rate means half your "booked meetings" waste AE time. Demand 70%+ held rates or find a new vendor.
How to improve: Send calendar holds with clear agendas, confirm 24 hours before, qualify harder upfront (ensure genuine interest, not just calendar availability).
What it measures: AE rating of meeting quality on 1-5 scale (ICP fit, budget authority, genuine interest).
Why it matters: High volume of low-quality meetings (score <3) burns AE trust and time. Track this to identify qualification gaps.
How to implement: Add required field in CRM post-meeting. Weekly review: meetings scoring <3 analyzed for pattern (wrong title, no budget, etc.).
What it measures: Percentage of held meetings that convert to Sales Qualified Leads (opportunities in pipeline).
Why it matters: This bridges SDR activity to revenue impact. Low SQL rates (<20%) indicate poor qualification or misaligned ICP.
How to improve: Tighten qualification criteria, align on BANT/MEDDIC framework with AE team, disqualify faster to protect AE time.
What it measures: Total monthly investment ÷ held meetings.
Why it matters: Ultimate efficiency metric. If outsourced cost per held meeting exceeds in-house costs, reevaluate or renegotiate.
How to calculate: (Monthly retainer + any per-meeting fees) ÷ held meetings. Compare to in-house: (Fully loaded SDR cost) ÷ held meetings. See full ROI calculator.
What it measures: Dollar value of opportunities created from SDR-sourced meetings.
Why it matters: Ultimate business outcome. If pipeline generated is <5x monthly cost, ROI is questionable.
Example: $8k/month retainer should generate $80k-$120k in pipeline monthly ($960k-$1.44M annually).
What it measures: Spam complaint rate, bounce rate, inbox vs spam folder placement.
Why it matters: Poor deliverability kills campaigns silently. If 40% of emails land in spam, your "sent" metrics are meaningless.
How to monitor: Use tools like Glockapps, Mail-Tester for seed testing. Demand weekly deliverability reports from agency. Pause campaigns if spam rates exceed 3%.
KPI | Target Benchmark | Red Flag Threshold | Primary Lever to Improve |
---|---|---|---|
Connect Rate | 10-15% | <5% | Parallel dialing, data quality |
Conversation → Meeting | 25-35% | <15% | Messaging, talk tracks, ICP fit |
Held Meeting Rate | 70-80% | <50% | Qualification rigor, confirmation process |
Meeting Quality (1-5) | 3.5+ | <3.0 | ICP refinement, disqualification criteria |
SQL Conversion | 30-40% | <20% | BANT/MEDDIC alignment, AE feedback |
Cost Per Held Meeting | Varies by ICP | >In-house cost | Volume, efficiency, contract renegotiation |
Pipeline Generated | 12-15x investment | <5x investment | ICP, close rate, deal size |
Spam Rate | <2% | >5% | Deliverability infrastructure, sending volume |
Outsourcing isn't always the right answer. Avoid wasting time and money by recognizing when building in-house is the better path:
If your SDRs need deep technical expertise (healthcare compliance, cybersecurity architecture, enterprise infrastructure), the ramp time and ongoing enablement make outsourcing impractical. Example: Selling AI-powered radiology software where SDRs must understand HIPAA, PACS integration, and radiologist workflows.
Better alternative: Hire in-house SDRs with healthcare/technical backgrounds; invest in comprehensive product training programs.
If you're still figuring out your ICP, messaging, and value proposition, outsourcing is premature. Agencies need repeatable playbooks—without PMF, you'll burn budget testing hypotheses.
Better alternative: Founder-led sales or a single versatile in-house rep to validate messaging and ICP before scaling with an agency.
At low deal sizes, outsourced SDR economics rarely work. If your average contract value is $5k-$8k, the cost per acquisition via outsourced SDRs will likely exceed customer lifetime value.
Better alternative: Self-service trials, PLG motion, or lower-cost inbound marketing channels. Save outsourced SDRs for enterprise upsell motions.
If deals close in 2-3 weeks with minimal human touch, you don't need SDRs—you need better inbound conversion and self-serve onboarding.
Better alternative: Optimize website CRO, demo automation, and trial-to-paid conversion funnels.
Agencies amplify what you give them. If you can't articulate your ICP firmographics, personas, pain points, and differentiation, outsourced SDRs will struggle.
Better alternative: Run internal discovery workshops first. Document your ICP (company size, industry, titles, pain points), value props by persona, and top 5 objections with rebuttals. Then engage an agency.
If your primary challenge is responding to inbound leads within 5 minutes (speed-to-lead advantage), outsourcing creates handoff friction and timezone issues.
Better alternative: Hire 1-2 in-house SDRs dedicated to inbound, or use conversational AI (chatbots, automated routing) to capture hot leads instantly.
In relationship-heavy industries (commercial real estate, wealth management, professional services partnerships), prospects value continuity and trust. Outsourced SDRs rotating every 6-12 months break this dynamic.
Better alternative: In-house SDR-to-AE career path where reps build long-term account relationships.
Even in challenging scenarios, outsourcing can work if you:
Our cold email outreach is designed to beat spam filters, generate high quality leads and appointments that close.
Our infrastructure allows us to scale volume quickly. Growing your sales team? We can provide your team with more appointments!